Kathleen Parker is concerned that Rush’s foray into the GOP’s flying pig vagina monologue has “marginalized legitimate arguments” about religious liberty. OK, so let’s hear them. I have yet to see a compelling argument for why my employer’s religious views should create exemptions to my* medical coverage that deviate from the medical standard of care.
The American Academy of Pediatrics has some experience in this area. Maybe we should ask them?
In some jurisdictions, exemptions to child abuse and neglect laws restrict government action to protect children or seek legal redress when the alleged abuse or neglect has occurred in the name of religion. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) believes that all children deserve effective medical treatment that is likely to prevent substantial harm or suffering or death. In addition, the AAP advocates that all legal interventions apply equally whenever children are endangered or harmed, without exemptions based on parental religious beliefs. To these ends, the AAP calls for the repeal of religious exemption laws and supports additional efforts to educate the public about the medical needs of children.
* I’m not a woman, but the point remains. So let’s be careful not to marginalize legitimate arguments about employer imposed religious exemptions to medical coverage that deviate from the medical standard of care. Your religious freedom ends where my medical coverage begins!